- DELPHI CODE PAGE AWARE STRINGS WINDOWS VS MAC OS X MAC OS X
- DELPHI CODE PAGE AWARE STRINGS WINDOWS VS MAC OS X INSTALL
- DELPHI CODE PAGE AWARE STRINGS WINDOWS VS MAC OS X FREE
If you need to test other language - just start your application with following command line parameters - "-l XX" or "-lang XX", where XX is a language code. Run your application, and the translation to be used will be chosen by your regional locale settings. po files with translation software, and generate. For different languages files should be copied and renamed like so "project1.XX.po", where XX is language code (e.g. po files in your "locale" or "languages" folder.
If you already have all components on your form, you'll have to move it a little bit, so it's modified.ĥ. Some of these values are used by OS in crash report dialog (and maybe in Event. Currently these are: project name, project description. Button allows to change string properties of manifest. Don't forget to create an appropriate folder.ģ. Applications that are required to drive input to other windows on the desktop (on-screen keyboard, for example) should set this value to true.' Text fields. You can put translation files right into application folder, but that would just make a mess. Enable "i18n" in "Project Options" and set "PO output directory" to "locale" or "languages". Add unit "defaulttranslator" to your uses list.Ģ. ``+hhhmmhoo/:::::oooooossymmhooooooooyyymmdoooooydddmmo//N
+++++smmdddo::///dmmhhh::+mmhooooooooooommmmmddddmmmdd/++m Mmd./mmmmmo::shhdmmhhh::+mmhooooooooyhhmmmmmmmmmmmyssdmm Nsssyyhmmhssooodmmhhh::+mmdyyyyyyyyddddddmmmmmmmmo::d M++sddmmm+::hddhhy::+ddddddddddddddhhhmmmmmdhh+++d Mddmmm/::ddddddddddddddmmmyss::/mmN | P A R T Y O N | Do you like how MacOS does the thing here? Do you like how Windows does the thing there? If one was outright superior, the other would cease to exist, be competitive, or even have any cut of the market (high/low end, specific function, etc.). Beyond that, it's a matter of preference.
DELPHI CODE PAGE AWARE STRINGS WINDOWS VS MAC OS X MAC OS X
I have tested this Mac OS X SMB Fix under Yosemite 10.10.
DELPHI CODE PAGE AWARE STRINGS WINDOWS VS MAC OS X FREE
SMBUp is a free application that replaces the Apple SMB implementation with the Open Source Samba version. The 2 systems are only similar in so much as they are OSes, they run on hardware, and they execute the same program types (internet browser, media player, etc.). Installing SMBUp is pretty simple, however configuration got me confused initially. Look at programs that are native to one OS and ported to the other, and they work better on their native OS than on the port.Ĭompare a Fortune 500 company to a company that barely clears annual revenue of 500K, and their processes to execute the same procedure will be vastly different, but both equally efficient for their respective scope.
DELPHI CODE PAGE AWARE STRINGS WINDOWS VS MAC OS X INSTALL
The only way you can tell, with any amount of accuracy, for specific programs or under specific loads, is to build 2 exact mirror systems, and have one install MacOS and one install Windows. What's the truth and is there any evidence to back up either claimĪrguing efficiency is a moot point, because efficiency depends on many factors. I'm trying to settle a argument to people I work with, one side is saying windows OS on the same machine uses there resources more inefficiently, while others say windows uses it just as well as Mac os,
0 kommentar(er)
